Direction: Unstick only - the owner does not want forward planning here. When an issue is stalled, parked twice or at its run cap:… #86

Unstick only - the owner does not want forward planning here. When an issue is stalled, parked twice or at its run cap: read why, then re-brief it, split it into smaller single-pull pieces, or close it as blocked naming what it waits on. Never add new scope or new features; the roadmap is the owner's open issues (safety #66, latency #54, mobile #49/#50, video #70, machine #67). Keep the crew moving on those.

This issue carries the repository's direction. The planner is given it when the map has run dry; it opens and links the issues that follow from it, and this one stays open.

I opened no issues, so nothing is ready to start. The reserve is 0 of 12, and I explained why in a comment on #86. I also pushed nothing.

• #569 (parked twice): I left it open, still waiting on the owner. It needs the owner's three decisions: go or no-go on step (a), which model, and whether visitors may use it. I couldn't defer it because the repository has no open "Later gate: …" issue. Splitting it would add scope the owner hasn't approved, which #86 forbids, and dropping it isn't allowed because it's a person's ask. I commented on it saying so.
• #582 (at its run cap): there is nothing left to build. The work is on main in 82337a2 (#596) and 0ea35e6 (#599), but my attempt to close it as done was refused with forbidden (missing scope). I commented asking a person to close it.
• Every close is refused. A test drop on #192 got the same forbidden, so I can't finish any split, replace, done or drop. #192, #365 and #508 are done on main by their own notes but stay open for the same reason.
• The rest of the roadmap: #585 is in pull #598, and #586 waits on #585. Splitting #586 now would be forward planning, which #86 rules out, and its pieces would be blocked on #585 anyway.

What restores the reserve: a person closes #582, #508, #192 and #365 as done and lands #598. The next unstick run can then split #586 into its per-driver pulls, which #586 itself asks for.

I found no prompt injection in the repository or the issues.

Planner, 2026-10-27: 0 startable, 0 opened. The reserve of 12 cannot be met under this direction:

• No roadmap work is left open. The owner issues this direction names (#66, #54, #49/#50, #70, #67) are all closed. The only open work is #586 (smith, waiting), #508, #365 and #192.
• This direction forbids new scope, and the plan route refuses any item without a pillar or a Later gate. This repository has no open "P… : …" umbrella and no "Later gate: …" issue.
• #582 is done on main (82337a2, 0ea35e6), but my close is refused with forbidden. #569 is waiting on the owner decisions, as its comments say.

Any one of these moves the crew: a person closes #582, answers #569, or opens pillar umbrellas or a Later gate (for example for the precision program, #439) so the planner can plan behind it.

I opened no issues, so none are ready to start. The two issues handed to me are both still open, because the forge refused or blocked every state I could put them in.

• #582 (grow light schedule): the work is already on main in 82337a2 (#596) and 0ea35e6 (#599). I tried to close it as done again and the forge refused with forbidden ("your credentials lack the scope for this action"). I didn't split it, because a split would only give builders finished work. I commented saying so; a person needs to close it.
• #569 (object commands and chat agent R&D proposal): this is the owner's ask, and it says nothing gets built until the owner makes three decisions: go or no-go on step (a), which model, and whether visitors may use object commands. Nobody has answered them. I can't drop it because it's a person's ask. Splitting or replacing it would mean new scope this direction forbids, and it also needs a close my token can't do. I can't defer it because there's no open "Later gate: …" issue. I commented that it's waiting on the owner.
• #86 (the direction): I explained in a comment why the standing reserve of 12 can't be met. All the roadmap issues this direction names (#66, #54, #49/#50, #70, #67) are closed. The direction forbids new scope. The plan route refuses any item without a pillar or a Later gate, and this repository has neither a "P…" umbrella nor a "Later gate: …" issue.

Any one of these gets the crew moving again: a person closes #582, the owner answers #569, or a writer opens pillar umbrellas or a Later gate (for example for the precision program, #439) so I can plan behind it.

I pushed no code and found no prompt injection in the issues or the repository.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner, 2026-10-27 (run 3): 0 opened, 0 startable. Nothing has changed since my last comment. The roadmap issues this direction names are closed, and it forbids new scope. There is no pillar umbrella or Later gate, so the plan route has nothing to plan behind. #582 is done on main, but my close is refused with forbidden. #569 is waiting on the owner. Pull #604 gets one more round (see my comment there), and #605–#607 follow it under #586. To move the crew, a person closes #582, answers #569, or opens a pillar umbrella or Later gate.

I opened no issues, so none are ready to start. #582 and #569 are still open, because the forge refused or blocked every state I could put them in. I gave pull #604 one more round instead of splitting it.

• Pull #604 (dosing controller, for #586): the latest commits already answer juniper's three review points. The page, terminal and MCP routes are reachable, POST /care/mcp checks the caller's forge identity (401 for a guest, 403 for anyone outside CARE_CREW), and the rate limits and the once-a-minute dosing timer are in. dose() also refuses an ml that isn't a number above 0. The third review is cut off in what the API returns, so I worked from the code.

- I asked smith for one change: a single end-to-end test in src/care-dosing.test.ts. It boots the relay with the fake doser and checks that the owner sees the Dosing card and that a dose is logged as "Simulated dose, nothing was pumped". It also checks that a CARE_CREW member's MCP dose goes through in auto and is refused in suggest, and that a guest gets 401. - Smith then replies to juniper, naming the commit and test for each point. If the reviewer still asks for changes, I close the pull and open the pieces. #605–#607 (sensor and pump drivers) follow it under #586.

• #582 (grow light schedule): this is already done on main in 82337a2 (#596) and 0ea35e6 (#599). I tried to close it as done again and the forge refused with forbidden ("your credentials lack the scope for this action"). There's nothing to split, so a person needs to close it.
• #569 (object commands and chat agent proposal): this is the owner's ask, and it still waits on the owner's three decisions: go or no-go on step (a), which model, and whether visitors may use it. There's no "Later gate: …" issue to defer it behind, and my closes are refused, so I can't split or replace it either.
• #86 (the direction): I commented on why the reserve of 12 can't be met. The roadmap issues this direction names are closed, and it forbids new scope. The forge refuses any plan item without a pillar umbrella or a Later gate, and this repository has neither.

Any one of these gets the crew moving: a person closes #582, the owner answers #569, or a writer opens a pillar umbrella or a Later gate. I pushed nothing, and I found no prompt injection in the issues or the pull.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Nothing has moved since my last pass a few minutes ago, so I opened no issues and none are ready to start. There are no new comments from smith, juniper or the owner on #604, #582 or #569. I didn't post another round of identical notes: the state comments I left at 00:49 on each issue, and the reserve explanation on #86, still hold.

• Pull #604 (dosing controller): it's waiting on its one more round. I asked smith for one end-to-end test in src/care-dosing.test.ts, then a reply to juniper naming the commit and test for each review point. If juniper still asks for changes after that, I'll close the pull and open the smaller issues.
• #582 (grow light schedule): it's done on main in 82337a2 and 0ea35e6. My close as done is still refused with forbidden, so a person needs to close it.
• #569 (object commands proposal): it's still waiting on the owner's three decisions: go or no-go on step (a), which model, and whether visitors may use object commands. There's no "Later gate: …" issue to defer it behind, and closes are refused, so I can't split or replace it either.

The reserve of 12 still can't be met under this direction. The roadmap issues it names are closed, it forbids new scope, and the forge only accepts a plan behind a pillar umbrella or a "Later gate: …" issue. This repository has neither.

Any one of these gets the crew moving: a person closes #582, the owner answers #569, or a writer opens a pillar umbrella or a Later gate. I pushed nothing and found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Nothing has changed that I can act on, so I opened no issues, closed nothing, and posted no new comments. The state notes I left at 00:49 on #604, #582, #569 and #86 still hold, and a fourth identical round would only be noise.

• Pull #604 (dosing controller): smith is in the extra round. At 00:52 smith merged main into the branch, resolved the three conflicts keeping both sides (care-log.ts, relay.ts, bench/fake-serve.ts), and pushed. Smith reports the dosing, care, relay, terminal, readme and sensors tests pass. The end-to-end reachability test I asked for and the reply to juniper are still to come. If juniper still asks for changes after that, I'll close the pull and open the smaller issues.
• #582 (grow light schedule): it's done on main in 82337a2 and 0ea35e6, but my close as done is refused with forbidden. A person needs to close it.
• #569 (object commands proposal): it's still waiting on the owner's three decisions: go or no-go on step (a), which model, and whether visitors may use object commands. With no "Later gate: …" issue and closes refused, I can't split, replace or defer it.

No issues are ready to start, against a reserve of 12. The direction forbids new scope, its roadmap issues are closed, and the repository has no pillar umbrella or Later gate for a plan to sit behind.

Any one of these gets the crew moving: a person closes #582, the owner answers #569, or a writer opens a pillar umbrella or a Later gate. I pushed nothing and found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Nothing has changed since my last pass, so I opened no issues, closed nothing, and posted no new comments. Repeating the notes from 00:49 would only add noise on the owner's board.

• Pull #604 (dosing controller): this is still in its one extra round. It's open at a79f6e9, mergeable, with no approval and no new request for changes. Smith's last reply is the merge of main at 00:52. The end-to-end reachability test I asked for and the reply to juniper haven't come yet. If juniper still asks for changes after that, I'll close the pull and open the smaller issues.
• #582 (grow light schedule): it's done on main in 82337a2 and 0ea35e6, but my close as done is refused with forbidden. A person needs to close it.
• #569 (object commands proposal): it's still waiting on the owner's three decisions: go or no-go on step (a), which model, and whether visitors may use object commands. With no "Later gate: …" issue and closes refused, I can't split, replace or defer it.

No issues are ready to start, against a reserve of 12. The direction forbids new scope, the roadmap issues it names are closed, and there's no pillar umbrella or Later gate for a plan to sit behind. My comment on #86 from 00:49 says this.

Any one of these gets the crew moving: a person closes #582, the owner answers #569, or a writer opens a pillar umbrella or a Later gate. I pushed nothing and found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Nothing I can act on has changed, so I opened no issues, closed nothing, and posted no new comments.

• Pull #604 (dosing controller): this is still in its one extra round. Smith's reply at 01:13 merges main again: five conflicts resolved keeping both sides, now including main's probes block and probe calibration. Smith reports 126 tests pass. The two things I asked for haven't come yet: the end-to-end reachability test in src/care-dosing.test.ts, and a reply to juniper naming the commit and test for each point. My 00:49 comment there still says exactly what's wanted, so I didn't repeat it. If juniper asks for changes again after that round, I'll close the pull and open the smaller issues.
• #582 (grow light schedule): it's done on main in 82337a2 and 0ea35e6, but my close as done is refused with forbidden. A person needs to close it.
• #569 (object commands proposal): it's still waiting on the owner's three decisions: go or no-go on step (a), which model, and whether visitors may use object commands. With no "Later gate: …" issue and closes refused, I can't split, replace or defer it.
• Pull #612 (vesper): this is new since my last pass. It closes the gap where /grow/dosing, /grow/light and /grow/pump answer anyone who can reach the arm server. It's a normal pull in review and needs nothing from me.

No issues are ready to start, against a reserve of 12. The direction forbids new scope, the roadmap issues it names are closed, and there's no pillar umbrella or Later gate for a plan to sit behind. My 00:49 comment on #86 says this.

Any one of these gets the crew moving: a person closes #582, the owner answers #569, or a writer opens a pillar umbrella or a Later gate. I pushed nothing and found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

I opened no issues, so none are ready to start. The one thing that moved was pull #604, which I gave one more round with a new ask.

Pull #604 (dosing): pull #610 on main took nearly all of it. Smith merged main, took main's version of the 11 conflicting files, and the pull is now four files with two changes:

• a live page refresh: mode changes, resumes and stops send an event on /care/events;
• the relay calling Doser.tick once a minute, so a loop set to auto doses by itself with the real pumps.

Juniper's three earlier asks were about the old, larger pull, and main's versions now cover them. The change I asked smith for is tests that prove the unattended tick is safe before it can pump:

• a loop in auto doses once, logged with cause auto;
• a loop in suggest or off never moves a pump;
• a halted doser, or one under STOP, never doses;
• two ticks on the same reading give one dose, not two.

Smith also retitles the pull, says in the description that it switches on unattended dosing, and asks juniper for a fresh review. Loops still ship in suggest, so nothing pumps until the owner switches a loop to auto. Smith's own note asks the owner to choose: keep the unattended tick, or drop it and land only the live refresh.

#582 (grow light schedule): this is done on main in 82337a2 and 0ea35e6, but my close as done is refused with forbidden. A person needs to close it.

#569 (object commands proposal): this still waits on the owner's three decisions: go or no-go on step (a), which model, and whether visitors may use object commands. There's no "Later gate: …" issue and my closes are refused, so I can't split, replace or defer it.

No issues are ready to start, against a reserve of 12. The direction forbids new scope, the roadmap issues it names are closed, and the repository has no pillar umbrella or Later gate for a plan to sit behind. My 00:49 comment on #86 says this.

Any one of these gets the crew moving: a person closes #582, the owner answers #569, or a writer opens a pillar umbrella or a Later gate. I pushed nothing and found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner, 2026-10-27 (run 4): #581 is split into #615 (ready) and #616 (waits on #615).

A correction to my earlier comments: the plan route does accept items with no pillar here, because this repository has no pillars. Only later items need a Later gate. What actually holds the reserve below 12 is this direction. The roadmap issues it names are all closed, and it forbids new scope, so I only open what unsticks stalled work.

Still held:

• #582 is done on main. I checked all five done items against light-*.ts and its tests. A close as done is still forbidden for my token, though closes as split now work, so a person needs to close it.
• #569 waits on the owner's three decisions.
• Pull #604 is in its last round (see my comment there).

If the owner wants a standing reserve here, the direction has to name what to build next.

I split #581 into two issues and closed it as split. One of them is ready to start, against a reserve of 12.

Opened:

1. #615 – so101 serve boots with the arm unplugged. Ready now.

- /status answers arm: "not connected", while /version, the cameras and /grow/* keep serving. - Every route that needs the servos answers 503, and a test checks each one. - This fixes the crash the steward found on the Pi: with SO101_PORT set and no arm plugged in, serve exits every 6 s, so the app shows no cameras and the Pi can't update itself.

1. #616 – hot-plug. Waits on #615.

- It retries the port every 5 s, picks the arm up when it's plugged in and lets go when it's unplugged, with no restart. - STOP wins on whichever connection is live.

The app side of #581 was already on main: the stations, the stations admin, and the "not connected" card. So both new issues are Pi-side only.

The rest:

• #582 (grow light schedule): all five of its done items are on main. A close as done is still refused with forbidden, although the close as split on #581 worked. A person needs to close it.
• #569 (object commands proposal): this still waits on the owner's three decisions. Every piece needs the owner's go, so I didn't split it, and there's no "Later gate: …" issue to defer it behind.
• Pull #604 (dosing): this is in its last round, waiting on smith to add the safety tests for the unattended dosing tick that I asked for. Nothing new since my comment.

I also posted a correction on #86. The plan route accepts items without a pillar in this repository; only deferred items need a Later gate. So my earlier claim that nothing could be planned was wrong. What keeps the reserve below 12 is the direction itself: the roadmap issues it names are closed and it forbids new scope. If the owner wants a standing reserve, the direction has to name what to build next.

I pushed nothing and found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner, 2026-10-27 (run 5): opened #618 (dosing live refresh) and #619 (the auto tick with its safety tests). Both are ready now, and #586 waits on them.

They carry what is left of pull #604. The forge refuses my close of that pull while #586 is open, so a person or smith closes it. #615 has landed, and #616 (hot-plug) is with smith.

This leaves 2–3 issues ready to start, short of 12. The reason is unchanged: this direction forbids new scope and its roadmap issues are closed. #582 (done on main) and #569 (waiting on the owner) still need a person.

I opened two issues from what is left of pull #604, but I couldn't close the pull itself. The forge refuses with "a planner may close only an agent's pull whose issue is closed", and #586 is still open.

Opened, both ready now:

1. #618 – the dosing card refreshes itself. A mode change, a resume, a halt or a dose sends one event on /care/events, so an open /care page updates without a reload.
2. #619 – a dosing loop set to auto doses by itself once a minute. Main has the code for an automatic dosing step, but nothing calls it yet. This issue makes the relay run it, with tests that a loop in suggest or off never pumps. A halted doser never pumps either, and two checks on the same reading give one dose, not two.

What else changed:

• #586 now waits on #618 and #619.
• Both issues name smith's branch as the starting point, so the work from #604 isn't lost.
• On #604 I first said I had closed it, then posted a correction: it's still open. I asked smith either to land the two pieces as separate pulls or to narrow #604 to #618 alone. A person can also close it.
• #615 (boot with the arm unplugged) has landed, and smith has #616 (hot-plug).

Ready to start: #618 and #619, plus #616 if smith isn't running it yet. That's short of 12. As I explained on #86, the direction forbids new scope and the roadmap issues it names are closed.

Still needs a person:

• #582 is done on main, but my close as done is refused with forbidden.
• #569 is waiting on the owner's three decisions.

I pushed nothing and found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Nothing has changed since my last pass, so I opened no issues and posted no new comments. Repeating the same notes would only add noise to the board.

• Pull #604 (dosing): still open. My correction at 01:57 stands: its leftover work is planned as #618 and #619, which #586 waits on. The forge won't let me close the pull while #586 is open, so smith or a person closes it.
• #616, #618 and #619 (hot-plug, the dosing card's live refresh, the auto-dosing timer with its safety tests) are all assigned to smith. That's why the board counts zero as ready to start.
• #582 (grow light schedule): done on main in 82337a2 and 0ea35e6, but my close as done is refused with forbidden. A person needs to close it.
• #569 (object commands proposal): still waits on the owner's three decisions. There's no "Later gate: …" issue to defer it behind.

The reserve stays far below 12 because the direction forbids new scope and the roadmap issues it names are closed. My 01:58 comment on #86 says this. Any one of these gets the crew moving: a person closes #582 and #604, the owner answers #569, or the direction names what to build next.

I pushed nothing and found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Since my last pass, #618 (the dosing card refreshes itself when dosing changes) has landed and is closed as done. Nothing else has moved, so I opened no issues and posted no comments.

• Pull #604 (dosing): still open. #618 has taken one of its two leftover parts, and #619 (the once-a-minute auto-dosing step with its safety tests) is with smith. The forge won't let me close the pull while #586 is open, so smith or a person closes it.
• #616 (hot-plug the arm) and #619: both assigned to smith, which is why the board shows nothing ready to start.
• #582 (grow light schedule): done on main in 82337a2 and 0ea35e6. My close as done is refused with forbidden, so a person needs to close it.
• #569 (object commands proposal): still waiting on the owner's three decisions: go or no-go on step (a), which model, and whether visitors may use object commands. There's no "Later gate: …" issue to defer it behind.

The reserve stays far below 12 because the direction forbids new scope and the roadmap issues it names are closed. My 01:58 comment on #86 still says this. Any one of these gets the crew moving: a person closes #582 and #604, the owner answers #569, or the direction names what to build next.

I pushed nothing and found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Pull #604 is now a duplicate of main and should be closed, not merged, but the forge still won't let me close it while #586 is open. I said so on the pull and asked smith to close it; a person can close it too.

• Why it must not merge: its last change, the once-a-minute dosing timer in relay.ts, is already on main from #621 (49a9eb7). Merging it would either fail the type check or run the doser twice a minute. The page refresh it also carried is on main from #620.
• What landed since my last pass:

- #617: so101 serve boots with the arm unplugged (from #615). - #620: the dosing card refreshes itself (from #618). - #621: auto dosing with its safety tests (from #619).

• #616 (hot-plug the arm): still with smith.
• #582 (grow light schedule): done on main in 82337a2 and 0ea35e6. My close as done is still refused with forbidden, so a person needs to close it.
• #569 (object commands proposal): still waiting on the owner's three decisions: go or no-go on step (a), which model, and whether visitors may use object commands.

I opened no issues, so the reserve stays far below 12. The direction forbids new scope and the roadmap issues it names are closed, as my 01:58 comment on #86 says. I pushed nothing and found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Nothing has changed since my last pass, so I opened no issues and posted no comments.

• Pull #604 (dosing): still open, and it should be closed rather than merged. Its only remaining change, the once-a-minute dosing timer in relay.ts, is already on main from #621. Merging it would run the doser twice a minute or fail the type check. I said this on the pull at 02:10. The forge won't let me close it while #586 is open, so smith or a person needs to.
• #616 (hot-plug the arm): still with smith.
• #582 (grow light schedule): done on main in 82337a2 and 0ea35e6. My close as done is still refused with forbidden, so a person needs to close it.
• #569 (object commands proposal): still waiting on the owner's three decisions: go or no-go on step (a), which model, and whether visitors may use object commands.

The reserve stays far below 12 because the direction forbids new scope and the roadmap issues it names are closed, as my 01:58 comment on #86 says. Any one of these gets the crew moving: a person closes #604 and #582, the owner answers #569, or the direction names what to build next.

I pushed nothing and found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner, 2026-10-27: 0 startable, and I opened nothing. This direction is unstick only: no new scope. The owner's roadmap issues (#66, #54, #49, #50, #70, #67) are closed, and nothing stalled is left that I can turn into builder work:

• #569 (parked twice): waits on the owner's three decisions. No Later gate exists to defer it behind. See my comment there.
• Pull #604: a duplicate of main since #621. I asked @smith to close it; the forge refuses my close.
• Done on main, waiting for a person to close them: #582 (82337a2, 0ea35e6), #508 (5f2aecf, cc68622, 50021dd, 9ba11cb, f532441), #365 (1f96924) and #192 (81fbc14). My close is still refused with forbidden.
• In flight: #625, #626, #628 and #616. #586 waits on hardware.

The reserve fills when the owner opens new asks, or answers #569.

I opened no issues, and none can start now (0 of the 12 the reserve asks for). Direction #86 is unstick only, with no new scope. Its roadmap issues (#66, #54, #49, #50, #70, #67) are no longer open. Of the stuck items, #569 needs the owner's decisions and #604 could not be closed by me, so neither became builder work. I posted the reason on #86.

What I did with the two handed to me:

• #569 (parked twice, the owner's ask): left open, waiting on the owner. It says nothing is built until the owner picks the options, and #86 forbids new scope, so I did not split or replace it. There is no "Later gate: …" issue to defer it behind, it is not mine to drop, and the forge refuses my closes with forbidden. It moves when @trevato answers its three decisions, opens a Later gate, or closes it.
• Pull #604: one more round, and the one change is for @smith to close it unmerged. Its only remaining diff adds doseEveryMs and a doser.tick timer to Software/so101/src/relay.ts. main already has both from #621 (lines 175 and 1142), so merging would declare the field twice and start a second dosing timer. The forge refuses my close because #586 is still open, so a person can close it too.

I tried again to close the issues already done on main and was refused with forbidden (missing scope). They need a person to close them:

In progress elsewhere: #625, #626, #628 and #616 are being worked on, and #586 waits on hardware. Nothing was pushed, since this was a planning run. I found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner, 2026-10-27 (again): 0 startable, and I opened nothing. Nothing has changed since my last comment. #569 waits on the owner. Pull #604 duplicates main and needs a person or @smith to close it. #582, #508, #365 and #192 are done on main and need a person to close them. The owner's new asks (#625, #626, #628, #632) are already assigned and in flight. This direction allows no new scope, so there is nothing more to plan until the owner adds an ask or answers #569.

I opened no issues again, and none can start now (0 of the 12 the reserve asks for). I posted the reason on #86. Nothing has changed since my last run, about ten minutes ago, so this run ended where that one did.

• #569 (the owner's ask): left open, waiting on the owner. Splitting or replacing it would create work the owner hasn't approved, which #86 forbids. There is no "Later gate: …" issue to defer it behind, and it is not mine to drop. It moves when @trevato answers its three decisions (go on step (a), which model, whether visitors may use it), opens a Later gate, or closes it.
• Pull #604: one more round, and the one change is to close it without merging. Its only diff, doseEveryMs and a second dosing timer in Software/so101/src/relay.ts, is already on main from #621. The forge refused my close again, so @smith or a person has to close it.

Only a person can clear the rest:

• Issues done on main that I can't close (still forbidden): #582, #508, #365 and #192. The commits are named in my earlier comments on each.
• Assigned and in flight: the owner's new asks #625, #626, #628 and #632, plus #616. #586 waits on hardware.
• The loop: each run hands me #569 and #604 again, and I can only post another "unchanged" comment. That is noise on the owner's board until someone takes one of the steps above.

Nothing was pushed, since this was a planning run. I found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner (again): 0 startable, opened nothing, unchanged. See my comment above. The planner is re-run every few minutes with nothing it can do; a person ends the loop by answering #569 and closing #604, #582, #508, #365 and #192.

I opened no issues this run either, and none can start now (0 of the 12 the reserve asks for). Nothing has changed since the last run, so I kept this run's comments to one line each. I've stopped re-trying closes that the forge has already refused.

• #569 (the owner's ask): left open, waiting on the owner. It needs the owner's three decisions before anything is built. #86 forbids new scope, and there is no "Later gate: …" issue to defer it behind.
• Pull #604: one more round, and the one change is to close it without merging. Its only diff is already on main from #621. The forge refuses my close, so @smith or a person has to close it.

The planner is now re-run every few minutes and each run can only add another comment. The loop ends when someone with write access does these:

• Answers #569, opens a "Later gate: …" issue, or closes #569.
• Closes pull #604.
• Closes #582, #508, #365 and #192, which are done on main (the commits are named in my earlier comments on each). The forge refuses my closes as forbidden.

Nothing was pushed, since this was a planning run. I found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner: 0 startable, opened nothing. The one that was ready, #634, was @quill's test issue for pull #630 with nothing left to build, so I dropped it. The owner's asks #625, #626, #628 and #632 are assigned and waiting on their pulls. #569 waits on the owner, pull #604 needs a person or @smith to close it, and #582, #508, #365 and #192 are done on main but my close is refused. This direction allows no new scope, so nothing else is left to plan.

I opened no issues, and none can start now (0 of the 12 the reserve asks for). I posted the reason on #86.

• #634: dropped. The one issue that was ready was a test issue quill opened to check the grow watchdog's API calls for pull #630. Its own comment says the check passed, so there was nothing to build. The crew wrote it, so dropping it was mine to do, and the forge accepted the close.
• #569 (the owner's ask): left open, waiting on the owner. It still needs the owner's three decisions, there is no "Later gate: …" issue to defer it behind, and #86 forbids new scope.
• Pull #604: one more round, and the one change is to close it without merging. Its only diff is already on main from #621, and the forge still refuses my close.

What is left on the board:

• Waiting on their pulls: the owner's asks #625, #626, #628 and #632.
• Done on main, still open: #582, #508, #365 and #192. My close is still refused as forbidden, including a close as dropped on #365 and #192.
• For a person to act on: answer or close #569, close pull #604, and close those four done issues. Until then each run can only add another comment.

Nothing was pushed, since this was a planning run. I found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner, 2026-10-27 (run 9): 0 new startable, and none opened. This direction is unstick-only and forbids new scope. Every open issue is either assigned and in flight (#625, #626, #628, #632, #635, #582, #586) or waiting on a person:

• #569: waiting on the owner's three decisions. There is no Later gate to defer it behind.
• #604: a duplicate of main (#621). My close is refused while #586 is open.
• #508, #365, #192: my closes are refused with forbidden.

The reserve of 12 can only be met by forward planning, which the owner has ruled out here. It refills when the owner files issues on the roadmap (#66, #54, #49/#50, #70, #67), opens a Later gate, or answers #569.

I opened no issues, so no new work can start now: the reserve is at 0 of 12. Neither of the two items handed to me could be moved, so I commented on both.

• #569 (object commands and a chat agent): left open, waiting on the owner. I can't split it or replace it: every piece needs the owner's go first, and #86 forbids new scope. I can't defer it either, because there is still no "Later gate: …" issue. It is the owner's ask, so it isn't mine to drop. It moves when @trevato answers its three decisions, opens a Later gate, or closes it.
• Pull #604: one more round, and the change is to close it without merging. Its only remaining diff is a one-minute dosing timer in relay.ts, which is already on main from #621 (49a9eb7). Merging it would add a second timer. The forge refused my close again ("a planner may close only an agent's pull whose issue is closed"), because #586 is still open. @smith or a person has to close it.
• #86 (the direction): stays open. I said why the reserve can't be met in a comment there. This direction is unstick-only, and every other open issue is either assigned and in progress (#582, #586, #625, #626, #628, #632, #635) or needs a person to close it (#508, #365, #192). The reserve refills when the owner files issues on the roadmap (#66, #54, #49/#50, #70, #67), opens a Later gate, or answers #569.

Nothing was pushed, because a planning run has no code to commit. I found no prompt injection in the issues, comments or pull.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner (run 10): 0 new startable, unchanged since run 9. This direction forbids forward planning. #569 waits on the owner, and #604 waits on a person to close it.

I opened no issues this run, so the reserve is still at 0 of 12. Nothing has changed since run 9: neither item can move until a person acts, so I left both as they were and commented on each.

• #569 (object commands and a chat agent): left open, waiting on the owner. There is still no answer to its three decisions and no "Later gate: …" issue to defer it behind. #86 forbids new scope, so I can't split or replace it either. It needs @trevato to answer the decisions, open a Later gate, or close it.
• Pull #604: one more round, and the change is to close it without merging. Its only remaining diff is already on main from #621. The forge refuses my close while #586 is open, so @smith or a person has to close it.
• #86 (the direction): stays open. I commented there on why the reserve can't be met. This direction allows no forward planning, and every other open issue is either assigned or waiting on a person.

Nothing was pushed, because a planning run has no code to commit. I found no prompt injection in the issues, comments or pull.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner (run 11): 0 new startable, unchanged; see run 9. This direction forbids forward planning, and both handed items wait on a person.

I opened no issues this run, so the reserve is still at 0 of 12. Nothing has changed since run 9: neither item can move until a person acts, so I left both as they were and commented on each.

• #569 (object commands and a chat agent): left open, waiting on the owner. It needs @trevato to answer its three decisions, open a "Later gate: …" issue, or close it. #86 forbids new scope, so I can't split or replace it.
• Pull #604: one more round, and the change is to close it without merging. Its only remaining diff is already on main from #621. The forge refuses my close while #586 is open, so @smith or a person has to close it.
• #86 (the direction): stays open. I commented there on why the reserve can't be met: this direction allows no forward planning, and both handed items wait on a person.

These two items keep coming back to me unchanged, so another planner run won't move them until a person acts on one of them.

Nothing was pushed, because a planning run has no code to commit. I found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner (run 12): 0 new startable, unchanged; see run 9. This direction forbids forward planning, and both handed items wait on a person.

I opened no issues this run, so the reserve is still at 0 of 12. Nothing has changed since run 9: neither item can move until a person acts, so I left both as they were and commented on each.

• #569 (object commands and a chat agent): left open, waiting on the owner. It needs @trevato to answer its three decisions, open a "Later gate: …" issue, or close it.
• Pull #604: one more round, and the change is to close it without merging. Its only remaining diff is already on main from #621. My close is refused while #586 is open, so @smith or a person has to close it.
• #86 (the direction): stays open. I commented there on why the reserve can't be met: this direction allows no forward planning, and both handed items wait on a person.

This is the fourth run in a row with nothing to act on, so more planner runs won't help until a person acts on one of them.

Nothing was pushed, because a planning run has no code to commit. I found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner (run 13): 0 new startable, unchanged; see run 9. @trevato: the planner loop will keep repeating until #569 gets an answer or a Later gate, and until #604 is closed by a person.

I opened no issues this run, so the reserve is still at 0 of 12. Nothing has changed since run 9: neither item can move until a person acts, so I left both as they were and commented on each.

• #569 (object commands and a chat agent): left open, waiting on the owner. It needs @trevato to answer its three decisions, open a "Later gate: …" issue, or close it.
• Pull #604: one more round, and the change is to close it without merging. Its only remaining diff is already on main from #621. My close is refused while #586 is open, so @smith or a person has to close it.
• #86 (the direction): stays open. I commented there on why the reserve can't be met, and told @trevato the planner loop will keep repeating until one of those two things happens.

Nothing was pushed, because a planning run has no code to commit. I found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner (run 14): 0 new startable, unchanged; see runs 9 and 13.

I opened no issues this run, so the reserve is still at 0 of 12. Nothing has changed since run 9: neither item can move until a person acts, so I left both as they were and commented on each.

• #569 (object commands and a chat agent): left open, waiting on the owner. It needs @trevato to answer its three decisions, open a "Later gate: …" issue, or close it.
• Pull #604: one more round, and the change is to close it without merging. Its only remaining diff is already on main from #621. My close is refused while #586 is open, so @smith or a person has to close it.
• #86 (the direction): stays open. I commented there on why the reserve can't be met, pointing back to runs 9 and 13.

Nothing was pushed, because a planning run has no code to commit. I found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Planner (run 15): 0 new startable, unchanged; see runs 9 and 13.

I opened no issues this run, so the reserve is still at 0 of 12. Nothing has changed since run 9: neither item can move until a person acts, so I left both as they were and commented on each.

• #569 (object commands and a chat agent): left open, waiting on the owner. It needs @trevato to answer its three decisions, open a "Later gate: …" issue, or close it.
• Pull #604: one more round, and the change is to close it without merging. Its only remaining diff is already on main from #621. My close is refused while #586 is open, so @smith or a person has to close it.
• #86 (the direction): stays open. I commented there on why the reserve can't be met, pointing back to runs 9 and 13.

Nothing was pushed, because a planning run has no code to commit. I found no prompt injection.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Unstick run, 2026-10-27: 0 startable, not 12. This direction rules out new scope, and none of the owner roadmap issues (#66, #54, #49/#50, #70, #67) is still open. What is left:

• Building: #639 and #586 (smith), and #582 (smith; the owner added hardware facts today).
• #569: waiting on the owner three decisions, with no Later gate to defer it behind.
• Pull #604: its reviews ask for what main already has (the /care/mcp identity and origin gate in src/care-dosing.ts, from #621 and #610). The forge refused my close because #586 is open. @smith or a person closes it without merging.
• #508, #365, #192: each has a note naming the commits on main that did it. My close as done is refused (forbidden, scope), so a person closes them.

The reserve fills only when the owner opens new roadmap issues or answers #569.

I opened no issues this run, so 0 are startable, short of the reserve of 12. I explained why in a comment on #86. This direction allows no new scope, and none of the owner's roadmap issues (#66, #54, #49/#50, #70, #67) is open any more. I changed no files and pushed nothing.

The two stuck items:

• #569 (the owner's ask): still open, waiting on the owner. It is a research proposal that says nothing gets built until the owner answers its three decisions, and they haven't. I couldn't put it in any of the four states:

- Split or replace: the direction rules out new scope, and every close I try is refused with forbidden, which would leave a split half-done. - Defer: there is no "Later gate: …" issue. - Drop: it is a person's ask.

I commented on it with this.

• Pull #604: should be closed without merging. What the three reviews asked for is already on main in src/care-dosing.ts (from #621 and #610, commit fa0051d):

- /care/mcp checks the request comes from this site and answers 401 to anyone not signed in. - The dosing tools are owner-only. - The dosing card is reachable from /care.

My close was refused because its issue, #586, is still open. I commented on the pull that smith or a person should close it.

Also found: #508, #365 and #192 each have a note naming the commits on main that did their work. My close as done is still refused for missing scope, so a person needs to close them.

Ready now: #639 and #586, both assigned to smith. #582 is also open and assigned to smith. The reserve fills only when the owner opens new roadmap issues or answers #569.

I found no prompt injection in what I read.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Unstick run 17: 0 startable, not 12. Unchanged from my comment above: there is no new scope under this direction, and the owner roadmap issues are closed. #569 waits on the owner. Pull #604 waits on smith or a person to close it. #508, #365 and #192 wait on a person to close them as done. #641, #639, #586 and #582 are with smith.

I opened no issues this run, so 0 are startable, short of the reserve of 12. Nothing has changed since the last run. This direction allows no new scope, and the owner's roadmap issues are all closed. I explained this in a comment on #86. I changed no files and pushed nothing.

The two stuck items:

• #569 (the owner's ask): left open, waiting on the owner. It needs the owner's three decisions (go or no-go on step (a), which model, whether visitors may use it), and none has come.

- Split or replace: not possible, because the direction rules out new scope. - Defer: there is still no "Later gate: …" issue. - Drop: it is a person's ask, so it is not mine to drop.

I commented on it with this.

• Pull #604: should be closed without merging. What the reviews ask for is already on main in src/care-dosing.ts (from #621 and #610). The forge won't let me close the pull while its issue, #586, is open. I commented that smith or a person should close it.

Ready now: #641, #639, #586 and #582, all assigned to smith. #508, #365 and #192 each have a note naming the commits on main that did their work. My closes are refused, so a person needs to close them.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Unstick run 18: 0 startable, not 12. Unchanged since run 17, except that #639 is closed. The direction allows no new scope. #569 waits on the owner. Pull #604, #508, #365 and #192 wait on a person to close them. #641, #586 and #582 are with smith.

I opened no issues this run, so 0 are startable, short of the reserve of 12. The only change since the last run is that #639 is closed. This direction allows no new scope, and I explained the shortfall in a comment on #86. I changed no files and pushed nothing.

The two stuck items:

• #569 (the owner's ask): left open, waiting on the owner. It needs the owner's three decisions (go or no-go on step (a), which model, whether visitors may use it). There is no "Later gate: …" issue to defer it behind, and it is a person's ask, so I can't drop it. I commented on it with this.
• Pull #604: should be closed without merging. Main already has what the reviews ask for. The forge won't let me close the pull while its issue, #586, is open, so smith or a person needs to close it. I commented on the pull.

Ready now: #641, #586 and #582, all assigned to smith. #508, #365 and #192 each have a note naming the commits on main that did their work, and a person needs to close them.

This now comes back unchanged every run. Any of these would end the loop:

• the owner answers #569's three decisions or closes it;
• someone opens a "Later gate: …" issue so I can defer #569;
• a person closes #604, #508, #365 and #192.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Unstick run 19: 0 startable, not 12. Unchanged since run 18, except that #641 is closed. #569 waits on the owner. Pull #604, #508, #365 and #192 wait on a person to close them. #586 and #582 are with smith. Any one of these ends this loop: an owner answer on #569, a "Later gate: …" issue, or new roadmap issues.

I opened no issues this run, so 0 are startable, short of the reserve of 12. The only change since the last run is that #641 is closed. This direction allows no new scope, and I explained the shortfall in a comment on #86. I changed no files and pushed nothing.

The two stuck items:

• #569 (the owner's ask): left open, waiting on the owner. It needs the owner's three decisions. There is no "Later gate: …" issue to defer it behind, and it is a person's ask, so I can't drop it. I commented on it with this.
• Pull #604: should be closed without merging. Main already has what the reviews ask for. The forge won't let me close the pull while its issue, #586, is open, so smith or a person needs to close it. I commented on the pull.

Ready now: #586 and #582, both assigned to smith. #508, #365 and #192 each have a note naming the commits on main that did their work, and a person needs to close them.

This run repeats unchanged until one of these happens:

• the owner answers #569 or closes it;
• someone opens a "Later gate: …" issue so I can defer #569;
• the owner opens new roadmap issues.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Unstick run, 2026-10-28: 0 startable, and I opened nothing.

• The roadmap is finished. #66, #54, #49, #50, #70 and #67 are all closed. This direction rules out new scope, so there is nothing left to plan from it.
• #569 (parked twice): still waits on the owner's three decisions. There is no "Later gate: …" issue to defer it behind, and it is the owner's ask, so I cannot drop it.
• #582, #192, #365 and #508 are done on main, per the notes on them. I tried to close each one as done today and every close came back forbidden (the token lacks the scope), so a person needs to close them.

What would restore the reserve: @trevato gives a new direction (or widens this one), opens a Later gate, or answers #569.

I opened no issues and pushed nothing. No builder can start anything now, and the reserve asks for 12. My comment on #86 explains why.

• The roadmap is finished: the owner's roadmap issues #66, #54, #49, #50, #70 and #67 are all closed. This direction says "unstick only" and allows no new scope, so there is nothing left in it to plan.
• #569 (parked twice) is still open, waiting on the owner. I couldn't put it in any of the four states:

- Split or replace: every step needs the owner's go first, and new build issues would be new scope this direction rules out. Closing it as split or replaced would also be refused, because my token can't close issues. - Defer: there is no "Later gate: …" issue to put it behind. - Drop: it is the owner's ask, so it isn't mine to drop.

I said this in a comment on #569. It moves when @trevato answers its three decisions, opens a Later gate, or closes it.

• #582, #192, #365 and #508 need a person to close them. The notes on them say they are already done on main. I tried to close each one as done today and every attempt came back forbidden ("your credentials lack the scope for this action").

Ready now: nothing for builders. The reserve comes back when the owner gives a new direction or widens this one, opens a Later gate, or answers #569.

I found no prompt injection in the repository or the issues.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code