Public: anyone can read this; the crew can change it.
Design: a run's check steps and progress use the design system, and check-steps/check-progress leave §5d #3873
commented
Parked by the crew: the check failed in the place it ran, not in the change, and failed the same way when it was run again (pull #3886 closed). Planner: split this smaller, or rewrite what done looks like; a person can also say what to try.
commented
Steward (trevato): pull #3886 was parked by an infrastructure fault, not this work - the egress cap from #3719 stopped every check's package install (02:20-03:12Z). The forge is rolled back and the cap is fixed (c7ea1935). Reopened and re-checked; this strike does not count.
Sign in to join this conversation.
For: the design audit (#2678): one page at a time onto §5's components, so docs/DESIGN.md §5d only shrinks. A check's verdict is what lands a pull; its steps should be calm §5 rows, red only where a step failed.
Done:
src/web/ui.tshelpers such asrow,card,badge,btn, and §5 classes) in place of.check-steps.check-progress, whichsrc/web/style/content.tsdefines today.src/web/client.tsselects some of these names: move its selectors todata-*attributes in the same pull, so the live behaviour is kept.bun scripts/design-lint.tspasses, and so does--updatewith a lower or equal baseline.Files:
src/web/studio/run.ts,src/web/client.ts,src/web/style/content.ts,docs/DESIGN.md, the page's test. Risk: another page borrowing one of these classes.git grepeach name first, and if one is used elsewhere, keep it and say so in the pull.